Virtue Ethics

Virtue Ethics is an ethical framework that judges a person's ethical value based on their character, rather than a set of principles. Aristotle is often credited for developing this framework. He claimed that an object or being can be "proper functioning", e.g. a knife is good if it can cut well, a flower is good if it can reproduce well, wild dogs are good if they can hunt well together, etc. He laid out a few generally beneficial qualities in people: we grow, are healthy and fertile, use reason, and we get along well together. This is partially derived from Natural Law Theory, which is a concept discussed by Christian philosophers like Thomas Aquinas. Natural Law Theory states that there are certain rights, beliefs, laws, etc. that are given by God to all people.

Aristotle stated that, in order to make ethical decisions, people should try to become more virtuous, and then the correct decisions will be self-evident. He proposed a list of 18 moral virtues of each person- things like courage, truthfulness, and ambition. The virtuous person holds a "golden mean" between excess and deficiency in each trait. For example, perfect courage stands between cowardice and recklessness, perfect generosity is between stinginess and prodigality, etc. Aristotle calls the knowledge of what decisions to make "practical wisdom". People with practical wisdom habitually do the right thing. To have practical wisdom is known as having "Eudimonia", which is sometimes translated as "human flourishing", and is sort of like ethical decision-making enlightenment. In order to find Eudimonia, you look to "moral exemplars", and try to make decisions like them. Asking yourself "What would Jesus do?" is an example of this, under Christian moral virtues.

This framework excels in that it provides a framework to become ethical, and can be practically helpful, whereas Consequantialism sometimes boils down to "hindsight is 20/20".

This framework falls short in that it can have overlap with Deontological ethics, and it isn't entirely clear where the two differ. Consider the situation in which two people leave a bar drunk, one at 1:13 am and the other at 1:20 am. Both drive home, and both drive the same distance and on similarly residential streets. The first driver makes it home without incident, but the second one hits a pedestrian and kills them. In this situation, both drivers made the same decisions, but the second driver had a bad result, while the first one had a neutral one. Under Consequentialism, the second driver was in the wrong, while the first one wasn't. Under Deontology, both drivers are in the wrong, since they made the same decisions. Under Virtue Ethics, we first ask ourselves "what would a virtuous person do?"- clearly, they would not drive drunk, but aren't we really just applying a rule, the same way we would with Deontology?

CrashCourse. “Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38.” YouTube, CrashCourse, 5 Dec. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvtOWEXDIQ.

CrashCourse. “ Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy #39. ” YouTube, CrashCourse, 5 Dec. 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpDSPVv8lUE.

Hursthouse, Rosalind, and Glen Pettigrove. “Virtue Ethics.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 8 Dec. 2016, plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Technology and Security

Good Business Practices

Social Media